Scott Parkin

EPA moves to block the largest MTR mine in West Virginia

Pro-Coal Democrats and Industry Lobbyists React

Reposted from the Understory

by Amanda Starbuck

We’re hearing some reassuring news from the EPA this morning.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced today that it is moving to block the largest mountaintop removal mining permit in West Virginia history, at Spruce Mine, operated by Arch Coal in Logan County.

EPA Region 3 Administrator, Shawn Garvin, made the following statement:

Coal, and coal mining, is part of our nation’s energy future, and for that reason EPA has made repeated efforts to foster dialogue and find a responsible path forward. But we must prevent the significant and irreversible damage that comes from mining pollution — and the damage from this project would be irreversible. This recommendation is consistent with our broader Clean Water Act efforts in Central Appalachia. EPA has a duty under the law to protect water quality and safeguard the people who rely on these waters for drinking, fishing and swimming.”

The EPA’s move to veto the Spruce mine permit is a big step for Appalachia’s historic mountains, clean water and community health. It is clear that EPA is responding to the resounding citizen opposition against blowing apart our nation’s oldest mountains.

It seems that EPA Administrator Jackson’s concern over the impacts of mountaintop removal coal mining on human health and waterways is now translating into meaningful action.

The science is clear that mountaintop removal is harming water resources in real and measurable ways. We hope that the Spruce Mine veto is a sign that EPA is going to begin using its full authority to stop this devastating practice.

We urge the EPA to take holistic and preventative measures, to issue no new MTR permits and end this devastating practice once and for all.

You can see the response of pro-coal West Virginia politicians here.  Expect more on this.


Water pollution control

Business is business, but water is much more important than anything else. I've read that in China rivers are extremely polluted. I wouldn't like to see such situation everywhere. The life of many people depend on clean water. You may download the book about industrial water pollution control from the torrents SE. Here is the link http://bytesland.com/view/Industrial-Water-Pollution-Control-3Ed-Eckenfe... > . But I think the water pollution is controled on much higher levels and the only thing people can do is to protest. Because who knows what the water will be like soon.

Because network failures now

Because network failures now constitute business failures, network management is a strategic business issue and skills in network management and automated network systems are crucial investments. Check out this update

The EPA’s move to veto the Spruce mine permit?

We urge the EPA to take holistic and preventative measures, to issue no new MTR permits and end this devastating practice once and for all.

It is the Spruce mine permit

It is the Spruce mine permit is a big step for Appalachia’s historic mountains, clean water and community health. It is clear that EPA is responding to the resounding citizen opposition against blowing apart our nation’s oldest mountains.

i hope this decision will be

i hope this decision will be beneficial. berita

I think moving the EPA is

I think moving the EPA is going to help a lot in the long run, a wise move if you ask me. ryan reynolds workout

zaislai vaikams

I think moving the EPA is going to help a lot in the long run, a wise move if you ask me.

The environmental impact of

The environmental impact of coal mining and burning is diverse. Though coal mining changes the landscape, federal and state laws now require all mined land to be reclaimed. As a result of mountain top removal, the landscape is changed, and streams may be covered with a mixture of rock and dirt. The water draining from these filled valleys may contain pollutants that can harm aquatic wildlife downstream. While mountain-top mining has been around since the 1970s, its use became more widespread and controversial since the 1990s. Regards, Renette oversized purses

I enjoyed reading your

I enjoyed reading your article. This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it and am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work.

I think overall the EPA is a

I think overall the EPA is a very good choice. If you think LONG term, then I think thats a very smart move. Bradley Scott ~ how to seduce a woman

Have to agree with the

Have to agree with the general opinion on here. It can only be a good thing that EPA is now involved. Its looking good for the future! titres services bruxelles

Risky, but brave move by the

Risky, but brave move by the EPA. I'm all for it. Insulin Cooler

The EPA’s move to veto the

The EPA’s move to veto the Spruce mine permit is a big step for Appalachia’s historic mountains, clean water and community health. It is clear that EPA is responding to the resounding citizen opposition against blowing apart our nation’s oldest mountains.. Free Cell Phone Spy

You will have to be aware

You will have to be aware from this "Hope they will get fix immediately " Regards, Hand Tools

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.